<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SEO Edinburgh Digital Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seoedinburgh.co.uk/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seoedinburgh.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google+ Google Places Check-ins Observations &amp; Thoughts by Ian Jamieson</title>
		<link>http://seoedinburgh.co.uk/google-plus-google-places-check-ins-observations-and-thoughts.php/comment-page-1#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Jamieson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoedinburgh.co.uk/blog/?p=350#comment-224</guid>
		<description>I agree that Google Check-ins are business-centric and that&#039;s all an effort to increase the use of Google Places. Google Places itself is a great opportunity but a bit basic in terms of functionality.

I&#039;ll certainly be encouraging Google Check-ins rather than the other check-in services - not because it&#039;s better, yet, but because it&#039;s Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google Check-ins are business-centric and that&#8217;s all an effort to increase the use of Google Places. Google Places itself is a great opportunity but a bit basic in terms of functionality.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll certainly be encouraging Google Check-ins rather than the other check-in services &#8211; not because it&#8217;s better, yet, but because it&#8217;s Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google+ Google Places Check-ins Observations &amp; Thoughts by Claus Conrad</title>
		<link>http://seoedinburgh.co.uk/google-plus-google-places-check-ins-observations-and-thoughts.php/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seoedinburgh.co.uk/blog/?p=350#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I think Google+ check-ins are too business-centric at the moment and lack many places (businesses and other POIs). If they want G+ to be a useful replacement for FourSquare and Facebook check-ins, Google oughta allow their regular users to add places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google+ check-ins are too business-centric at the moment and lack many places (businesses and other POIs). If they want G+ to be a useful replacement for FourSquare and Facebook check-ins, Google oughta allow their regular users to add places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

